I don’t know how things are in other areas of the country, but here in DC we have a rash of police officers and security guards issuing barring notices to people, ostensibly on behalf of the property owners. The DC Police Department describes the barring notice fairly innocuously:
A barring notice is a tool that property owners and/or persons lawfully entitled to possession of property (and their agents whom they have approved to serve in such a capacity) may use to restrict an individual who is not lawfully present on their private property to ensure safety at the premises. If individuals violate a barring notice by appearing on the property after having received notice that they are not permitted on the property, they may face arrest and/or prosecution for unlawful entry on the premises
It all sounds so reasonable: property owners have the right to tell people to leave their property and not come back. Violators can be charged with Unlawful Entry under DC Code 22-3302, which carries a max of 180 days and $1000 fine. The police and security guards, however, have been using these notices as a put-into-jail-free card, especially against the homeless and people in public housing.
Often police officers pressure restaurant managers and store owners into allowing them to issue a barring notice against an “undesirable” patron. For example, I have had a couple of homeless clients who have had barring notices from the local McDonalds, Burger King, and Safeway. (Theoretically, police do not have the right to bar people from private property – see Kelly v. U.S., 348 A.2d 884, 887 (DC 1976)). The problem is that these restaurants and stores continue to want to take the clients’ money. So they allow the “barred” individual back in to buy food, eat, etc. But then the clients can be arrested for “violation” of the barring notice sometime much later, even though they were allowed to come back in after issuance of the notice. These people then face charges of Unlawful Entry.
A different problem occurs when security guards of public housing complexes issue barring notices to “undesirable” guests of tenants, even if they live there with family members, etc. The security guards use these to effectively evict these people from their apartment without going to court (though the lease-holding family members can stay).
There is no statute that prohibits violation of a barring notice. But the police (and often the courts) treat the barring notice as if it were a stay-away order or civil protection order issued by a judge (with unlawful entry carrying the same penalty as violation of one of these orders). At most a barring notice should be used as evidence that a property owner doesn’t want the person on his/her property and the person knows he is not invited, IF the property owner is consistent about not allowing the person back in. But that’s often not what happens; in many cases, the person is allowed back in from time to time, but then pisses off a police officer who uses the barring notice to arrest him and charge him with unlawful entry. The problem arises when the barring notice is treated as a presumption that the crime was committed, short-cutting the government’s burden of proof.
I suppose I am venting. I got an acquittal on an unlawful entry case based on one of these barring notices today, so you could say the system worked, sort of. My client should never have had to face these criminal charges with the risk of jail time. I am just pissed at these things and how they seem to work in practice, that’s all.